<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTwin Cableless PC Connection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winarco.com/itwin-cableless-pc-connection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winarco.com/itwin-cableless-pc-connection/</link>
	<description>Product and Info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:25:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: remote access</title>
		<link>http://winarco.com/itwin-cableless-pc-connection/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>remote access</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winarco.com/?p=7822#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I am unsure how having a device, that still works via the internet, is easier or safer than using remote access software. I like the idea behind it, but if you are going to use an iTwin, why not save the money and just use a USB drive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unsure how having a device, that still works via the internet, is easier or safer than using remote access software. I like the idea behind it, but if you are going to use an iTwin, why not save the money and just use a USB drive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
